A week’s worth in one go
Well I’ve managed to resist the temptation to continue the David Blunkett theme from last week’s posts with a comment about his alleged afair with a married woman. Until now…
Normally I really don’t care about politicians’ private lives unless they happen to do something particularly hypocritical or dishonest; they’re only human after all. If someone in an important, stressfull position wants to unwind at the end of the day by kicking back with a Camberwell Carrot, or dresses up as a nun with an orange in their gob every Saturday night, good for them. I’d rather be governed by people with the usual range of human weaknesses, who can at least empathize with the rest of us, than a bunch of sanctimonious, repressed ivory tower-dwellers who consider themselves infallible.
However, I must admit to taking some delight to this particular Home Secretary having his privacy invaded. Especially after all his Christian moralizing (he’s a well known proponent of church schools — presumably ones that teach the Nine Commandments. Oh hang on, then there was the war too — make that the Eight Commandments).
Seems I’m not the only one not mentioning the allegations, with most of the mainstream media deciding to avoid treading on eggshells here (my excuse: too busy coding PHP. Their excuse: none/don’t like rocking the boat?). Channel 4 News’ daily Snowmail message did at least shed some light on their dilema:
Much discussion here about the revelations concerning Home Secretary D Blunkett’s relationship with a married woman. A lively exchange of views in the newsroom about whether covering this story is merely prurient, or whether it’s of legitimate public interest because of what it tells us about how the ruling class deals with such affairs and also how it’s all viewed by the ruled class. So, typical up-tight British prudishness and tabloid sensationalism? Or, how come Downing street says firmly that this is all a private matter for the (unmarried) Home Secretary, and yet it was Downing Street who took such a commanding role in a previous affair by a Cabinet Minister - ordering (married) Robin Cook, the then Foreign Secretary, to sort his life out. What’s the difference? The marital status of the men involved? A change in tactics of news management? Or a genuine change in attitudes?
Which reminds me, I went on a cracking boat party on the Thames last Friday, where I met a rather charming young woman who was a producer on Channel 4 News. (She told me, unsurprisingly, that Jon Snow is every bit as nice and funny as one would expect, and that he swears like a trooper). The boat set off from Festival Pier at 8pm, and we tootled up and down the river between docklands and Putney until 2am, by which time Chris had done a bit of DJing, and we’d all got wonderfully drunk. Huzzah!
Despite it being Friday the 13th, no one fell overboard, and the vessel stayed afloat until we docked; just as well really — given the number of new media types aboard, a sinking would probably have wiped out about a quarter of London’s Flash designers (no bad thing, some would argue!). That said, Simon, who was up from Cardiff for the weekend, did manage to leave his bag in the taxi on the way back to Chez Badger, meaning that we spent most of Saturday traipsing round the shops so he could buy replacement clothes, shades, dental floss etc…!
The upside being that we found ourselves in a Soho watering hole by about 6pm, before heading over to Shoreditch, where we spent a small fortune on silly-priced-but-oh-so-lovely cocktails. We were getting a bit peckish by about 10.30, so decided to head back here to grab a curry, and ended up watching the Adrian Lyne remake of Lolita on TV with a couple of bottles of Faustino. Hadn’t seen that version before, and it turned out to be better and funnier than I’d expected — wonder what Kubrick would have made of it had he made his version thirty years later? Mind you, even in 1997 they had to make Delores 14 rather than 12 as she is in the book.
I also had fairly low expectations of The Bourne Supremacy, which I went to see on Sunday, but it was actually very, very good — everything Bond films should be but aren’t. It’s not a particularly great plot, but Paul Greengrass’s direction was spot on, action-packed but taut and quite dark, and without over-reliance on the usual OTT Hollywood special effects. And it features one of the best car chases I’ve ever seen.
Well that’s more than enough for one entry here. I promise not to mention Blunkett for at least a week now (unless of course Lucy contracts rabies and attacks him, in which case I might allow myself a smirk).